One-time trialPartially privateMedium High confidence

AI.cc / AICC

$1 for new accounts; it does not recur.

Visit provider
Free accessOne-time trial
Payment cardNo
AccountRequired
Sources5 first-party links
API endpointhttps://api.ai.cc/v1

Models mentioned

3
300_plusauthentication_requiredHTTP_401

Equivalent paid value

$1.00 once
Daily spreadNot available
Weekly spreadNot available
Monthly spreadNot available
One-time$1.00

How this was valued: Face value of the $1 free-token balance in the $0 Start package; expiry is unpublished, so no period normalization is shown.

Limits and terms

Signup Credit USD
1
Recurrence
No
Expiry
not published
Rate Limits
not published

What happens to your prompts?

Partially privatePartial review

Public terms and privacy pages do not provide an API-specific promise covering prompt retention, model training, product improvement, or upstream model handling.

Plan Scope
AI.cc hosted multimodal API and $1 Start-package trial.
Prompt Retention
not documented
Response Retention
not documented
Ordinary Logging
Website, account, device, and service-monitoring data are described, but API content logging is not separated clearly.
Model Training
not documented
Product Improvement
not documented for api content
Human Or Operator Access
Service monitoring is reserved, but no API-content access boundary is published.
Subprocessors And Routing
AI.cc aggregates hundreds of models and providers; route-specific handling is not disclosed in a public model catalog or API data policy.
Deletion Controls
General account/privacy requests exist, but API prompt and output deletion controls are not documented.
Caveat
The public legal pages are chiefly website and account policies and do not establish service-specific prompt governance.

Governing documents

Eligibility

Account Required
Yes
Payment Method Required
not documented

Primary sources

5

Before you build with AI.cc / AICC

Read the classification narrowly

This record has current first-party evidence for some zero-cost hosted inference. The label describes the bounded offer supported by evidence on 2026-09-19; it does not guarantee permanence, production suitability, uptime, latency, model quality, or access from every region.

Resolve the live model route

This snapshot records 3 model IDs. Match the exact ID against the provider's live catalog before using it in code; zero-price routes and aliases can rotate while an older documentation page remains online. The recorded base endpoint is https://api.ai.cc/v1, but the provider's current API reference remains authoritative for paths, authentication, and request shape.

Confirm account and billing boundaries

An account is required, so public catalog evidence cannot by itself prove the limits, balance, or billing behavior attached to your workspace. The reviewed evidence explicitly says no payment card is required. Re-check the signup flow because eligibility and billing controls can change after the snapshot. The equivalent paid value shown here prices a documented allowance where possible; it is not cash, guaranteed savings, or protection from overage.

Re-read the prompt policy for your plan

This record classifies the reviewed handling as “Partially private”: Public terms and privacy pages do not provide an API-specific promise covering prompt retention, model training, product improvement, or upstream model handling. Provider policies can distinguish free, paid, enterprise, opted-in, and feature-specific traffic, so verify the governing terms for the exact account and route that will receive your data.

Follow the evidence, then re-check it

The record links 5 first-party sources covering the offer, catalog, limits, pricing, terms, privacy, or adoption evidence available to the audit. Prefer the newest governing document or live catalog when sources disagree, and submit a correction when a provider changes a material term.

Match the quota to the workload shape

Translate the published allowance into the traffic pattern you actually expect instead of comparing headline totals alone. A daily token pool can look generous while a low requests-per-minute or concurrency ceiling blocks interactive bursts; a high request limit can still fail a long-context job when input, output, or per-request tokens are capped. Separate prompt tokens from generated tokens, include retries and tool calls, and test the largest realistic payload. If the provider documents more than one limit window, the tightest window at your peak load is the practical ceiling. Research, experimental, and community access can also carry eligibility or fair-use constraints that cannot be modeled as a simple number.

Plan fallback without changing the rules

A fallback should preserve more than API syntax. Confirm that the substitute route supports the required modality, context length, streaming behavior, structured output, tools, and safety controls, then compare its prompt-retention and training terms. An OpenAI-compatible request shape does not make providers operationally or contractually equivalent. Decide which errors may trigger a retry, cap retry storms, and prevent an exhausted free route from silently switching to a billable model. If deterministic output matters, record the model revision and sampling settings; rotating aliases and free-model pools can change behavior even when the endpoint remains available.

Monitor the offer as a dependency

Capture the model ID, response model field, rate-limit headers, usage fields, latency, HTTP status, and any provider request identifier for each test. Watch for authorization failures, quota exhaustion, catalog removal, policy revisions, and dashboard balance changes as separate failure modes. Re-check the provider’s live catalog and governing pages on a schedule proportionate to the workload’s importance, and keep the dated sources that supported your decision. Free capacity is especially suitable for prototypes, evaluations, fallbacks, and bounded workloads when the application can tolerate change; a production dependency still needs observability, an exit path, and an owner responsible for re-verification.

Test one complete request before scaling

Start with the smallest permitted request using the exact credential, model ID, endpoint, and account type you intend to deploy. Record the HTTP status, response headers, usage fields, latency, and any dashboard balance change. Then exercise the failure path: an invalid model, an exhausted quota, or a rate-limit response should fail clearly without silently switching to a paid route. If the provider supports streaming or tool calls, validate those features separately because a free model can expose a narrower capability set than its paid counterpart. Keep a budget ceiling outside the application whenever billing is possible, and avoid sending sensitive data until the observed route matches the reviewed data agreement.